Safety and Efficacy of Flexible-Dose Deutetrabenazine in Children and Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tourette syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of motor and phonic tics; treatments for tics are associated with safety concerns. Deutetrabenazine is a selective vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease and tardive dyskinesia in adults. Objective: To examine whether deutetrabenazine is effective and safe for the treatment of Tourette syndrome in children and adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2/3, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-titration study included children and adolescents (aged 6-16 years) with Tourette syndrome with active tics causing distress or impairment (ie, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score [YGTSS-TTS] ≥20). The trial was conducted over 12 weeks, with 1 week of follow-up from February 2018 to November 2019 at 36 centers in the United States, Canada, Denmark, Russia, Serbia, and Spain. Data analysis was conducted from January 31 to April 22, 2020. Intervention: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive deutetrabenazine or placebo, titrated during 7 weeks to an optimal level, followed by a 5-week maintenance period. The maximum total daily deutetrabenazine dose was 48 mg/d. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to week 12 in YGTSS-TTS. Key secondary end points included changes in Tourette Syndrome-Clinical Global Impression, Tourette Syndrome-Patient Global Impression of Impact, and Child and Adolescent Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living subscale score. Safety was assessed based on treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, questionnaires, and laboratory parameters. Results: A total of 119 participants were randomized to deutetrabenazine (59 participants; mean [SD] age, 11.5 [2.5] years; 53 [90%] boys; 49 [83%] White; 3 [5%] Black) and placebo (60 participants; mean [SD] age, 11.5 [2.6] years; 51 [85%] boys; 53 [88%] White; 3 [5%] Black). At week 12, the difference in YGTSS-TTS score was not significant between deutetrabenazine and placebo (least squares mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -4.1 to 2.8; P = .69; Cohen d, -0.07). There were no nominally significant differences between groups for key secondary end points. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 38 patients (66%) and 33 patients (56%) receiving deutetrabenazine and placebo, respectively, and were generally mild or moderate. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of deutetrabenazine in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome, the primary efficacy end point was not met. No new safety signals were identified. These results may be informative for future studies of treatments for tics in Tourette syndrome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452943.

Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Deutetrabenazine in Children and Adolescents for Tics Associated With Tourette Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tourette syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of motor and phonic tics, often accompanied by behavioral and psychiatric comorbidities. Deutetrabenazine is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor approved in the US for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease and tardive dyskinesia. Objective: To report results of the ARTISTS 2 (Alternatives for Reducing Tics in Tourette Syndrome 2) study examining deutetrabenazine for treatment of Tourette syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study was conducted over 8 weeks with a 1-week follow-up (June 21, 2018, to December 9, 2019). Children and adolescents aged 6 to 16 years with a diagnosis of Tourette syndrome and active tics causing distress or impairment were enrolled in the study. Children were recruited from 52 sites in 10 countries. Data were analyzed from February 4 to April 22, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to low-dose deutetrabenazine (up to 36 mg/d), high-dose deutetrabenazine (up to 48 mg/d), or a matching placebo, which were titrated over 4 weeks to the target dose followed by a 4-week maintenance period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to week 8 in the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS) for high-dose deutetrabenazine. Key secondary end points included changes in YGTSS-TTS for low-dose deutetrabenazine, Tourette Syndrome Clinical Global Impression score, Tourette Syndrome Patient Global Impression of Impact score, and Child and Adolescent Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living subscale score. Safety assessments included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, and questionnaires. Results: The study included 158 children and adolescents (mean [SD] age, 11.7 [2.6] years). A total of 119 participants (75%) were boys; 7 (4%), Asian; 1 (1%), Black; 32 (20%), Hispanic; 4 (3%), Native American; 135 (85%), White; 2 (1%), multiracial; 9 (6%), other race; and 1 (0.6%), of unknown ethnic origin. Fifty-two participants were randomized to the high-dose deutetrabenazine group, 54 to the low-dose deutetrabenazine group, and 52 to the placebo group. Baseline characteristics for participants were similar between groups. Of the total 158 participants, 64 (41%) were aged 6 to 11 years, and 94 (59%) were aged 12 to 16 years at baseline. Mean time since Tourette syndrome diagnosis was 3.3 (2.8) years, and mean baseline YGTSS-TTS was 33.8 (6.6) points. At week 8, the difference in YGTSS-TTS was not significant between the high-dose deutetrabenazine and placebo groups (least-squares mean difference, -0.8 points; 95% CI, -3.9 to 2.3 points; P = .60; Cohen d, -0.11). There were no nominally significant differences between groups for key secondary end points. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 34 participants (65%) treated with high-dose deutetrabenazine, 24 (44%) treated with low-dose deutetrabenazine, and 25 (49%) treated with placebo and were generally mild or moderate. Conclusions and Relevance: In this fixed-dose randomized clinical trial of deutetrabenazine in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome, the primary efficacy end point was not met. No new safety signals were identified. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571256.

Pharmacokinetics of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine: Dose Proportionality and Food Effect.

Deutetrabenazine (Austedo, Teva), an approved treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease and tardive dyskinesia in adult patients, is a rationally designed deuterated form of tetrabenazine. Two studies assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of deutetrabenazine compared with tetrabenazine, and the effects of food on absorption of the deuterated active metabolites, α-dihydrotetrabenazine (α-HTBZ) and ß-dihydrotetrabenazine (ß-HTBZ). One study was an open-label 2-part study in healthy volunteers; the first part included a crossover single dose of two 15 mg candidate deutetrabenazine formulations in fed and fasted states compared with tetrabenazine 25 mg in the fasted state, and the second part included single and repeated dosing of the commercial formulation of deutetrabenazine (7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg) compared with tetrabenazine 25 mg. The second study was an open-label 5-way crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 32) to evaluate relative bioavailability of 4 dose levels of the commercial formulation of deutetrabenazine (6, 12, 18, and 24 mg) with a standard meal and 18 mg with a high-fat meal. Both studies confirmed longer half-lives for active metabolites and lower peak-to-trough fluctuations for the sum of the metabolites (total [α+ß]-HTBZ) following deutetrabenazine compared with tetrabenazine (3- to 4-fold and 11-fold, respectively) in steady-state conditions. Deutetrabenazine doses estimated to provide total (α+ß)-HTBZ exposure comparable to tetrabenazine 25 mg were 11.4-13.2 mg. Food had no effect on exposure to total (α+ß)-HTBZ, as measured by AUC. Although the total (α+ß)-HTBZ Cmax of deutetrabenazine was increased by ≈50% in the presence of food, it remained lower than that of tetrabenazine.

Crushing deutetrabenazine for treatment of tardive dyskinesia in a patient with severe orofacial symptoms: A case report.

PURPOSE: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a hyperkinetic movement disorder that results from exposure to dopamine receptor antagonists and/or first- and second-generation antipsychotics. While cessation of the offending agent(s) through early detection is recommended, TD symptoms may be irreversible and require further treatment. Deutetrabenazine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of persistent TD. Irreversible orofacial dyskinesia, a common affliction in TD, can progress to severe oropharyngeal dysphagia requiring alternate means of nutrition and medication delivery. Enteral administration of crushed deutetrabenazine has not been studied, and its use to treat TD in patients who cannot take medications by mouth has not been reported previously. SUMMARY: A 38-year-old female patient with a history of bipolar I disorder and TD secondary to atypical antipsychotic exposure developed worsening athetosis, hyperkinesia, and severe orofacial dyskinesia after initiation of ziprasidone. The patient had no improvement after discontinuation of atypical antipsychotics and required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement for nutrition due to persistent aspiration and inability to tolerate oral nutrition. Despite a lack of information regarding administration of crushed deutetrabenazine tablets via PEG, that form of therapy was initiated and resulted in improvement of TD symptoms without noticeable adverse effects. CONCLUSION: TD can result in significant orofacial dyskinesia with impaired delivery of needed medications and nutrition. We describe a case in which a patient with severe TD and orofacial dyskinesia experienced improvement of symptoms with use of crushed deutetrabenazine. Larger studies to further evaluate use of crushed deutetrabenazine for treatment of TD are needed.

Intranasal delivery of tetrabenazine nanoemulsion via olfactory region for better treatment of hyperkinetic movement associated with Huntington's disease: Pharmacokinetic and brain delivery study.

Tetrabenazine reduces chorea symptoms associated with Huntington's disease by depleting monoamines in pre-synaptic vesicles. It exhibits low aqueous solubility and undergoes first pass metabolism due to which it has low oral bioavailability. The aim of present work was to formulate intranasal tetrabenazine loaded nanoemulsion for better management and treatment of hyperkinesia related with Huntington's disease. A quality by design (QbD) technique was employed as statistical multivariate approach for formulation and optimization of nanoemulsion. Optimized formulation showed droplet size of 106.80 ±â€¯1.96 nm with polydispersity index (PDI) value of 0.198 ±â€¯0.005 and -9.63 ±â€¯0.63 mV zeta potential. Ex-vivo drug permeation studies were carried out and found that the formulation has an augmented permeation by 1.68 times as compared to tetrabenazine suspension. MTT assay on neuro-2a cell lines showed that tetrabenazine loaded nanoemulsion displayed better cell viability than placebo and aqueous drug solution at ½ × Cmax, Cmax and 2 × Cmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters in brain after intranasal administration of tetrabenazine nanoemulsion were found to be Cmax = 3.497 ±â€¯0.275 µg/mL, AUC0-12 = 29.196 ±â€¯0.870 µg h/mL and elimination rate constant (ke) = 0.097 ±â€¯0.012 h-1 where as in plasma the pharmacokinetic parameters were Cmax = 1.400 ±â€¯0.084 µg/mL, AUC0-12 = 12.925 ±â€¯0.340 µg h/mL and ke = 0.061 ±â€¯0.010 h-1. Histopathological studies of porcine nasal mucosa showed that nasal mucosa remains intact when treated with tetrabenazine loaded nanoemulsion. Thus it can be concluded from study that optimized nanoemulsion formulation of a tetrabenazine was robust and its delivery through nasal route is a viable alternative to other routes of administration for treatment of hyperkinesia associated with Huntington's disease.

Pharmacokinetic and Metabolic Profile of Deutetrabenazine (TEV-50717) Compared With Tetrabenazine in Healthy Volunteers.

Deutetrabenazine (Austedo, Teva Pharmaceuticals) is a deuterated form of tetrabenazine. It is the first deuterated drug to receive US regulatory approval and is approved for treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease and tardive dyskinesia. Two oral single dose studies comparing deutetrabenazine (25 mg) with tetrabenazine (25 mg) in healthy volunteers evaluated the impact of deuteration on pharmacokinetics of the active metabolites, alpha-dihydrotetrabenazine (α-HTBZ) and beta-dihydrotetrabenazine (ß-HTBZ), metabolite profile, safety, and tolerability. In the two-way, cross-over study, the mean elimination half-life of deuterated total (α + ß)-HTBZ was doubled compared with nondeuterated total (α + ß)-HTBZ, with a twofold increase in overall mean exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf )) and a marginal increase in mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax ). In the mass balance and metabolite profiling study, there were no novel plasma or urinary metabolites of [14 C]-deutetrabenazine relative to [14 C]-tetrabenazine. Specific deuteration in deutetrabenazine resulted in a superior pharmacokinetic profile and an increased ratio of active-to-inactive metabolites, attributes considered to provide significant benefits to patients.

Revisiting Tardive Dyskinesia: Focusing on the Basics of Identification and Treatment.

The use of second-generation antipsychotics has not eliminated tardive dyskinesia (TD), and the prevalence of the disorder is higher than commonly realized. The involuntary movements of TD can decrease patients' quality of life, cause embarrassment, and lead to social withdrawal. Clinicians must evaluate patients taking DRBAs for TD risk factors and regularly screen them for TD using a rating scale. Familiarity with tools and diagnostic criteria will enable clinicians to conduct a differential diagnosis. Once a diagnosis is made, medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration can be used to treat the condition. These medications are effective, but clinicians should be aware of key differences. A baseline assessment and regular follow-up evaluations will allow the clinician to monitor the patient's progress and make adjustments to meet treatment goals.​.

Valbenazine and deutetrabenazine: Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitors for tardive dyskinesia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence for valbenazine and deutetrabenazine use for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD). SUMMARY: A literature search was conducted to gather relevant data regarding the use of valbenazine and deutetrabenazine for TD management. PubMed, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the following keywords and MeSH terms: valbenazine, deutetrabenazine, tardive dyskinesia, VMAT2 inhibitors, and vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitors. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses published in English from April 2015 to August 2019 were included. Valbenazine 40-80 mg and deutetrabenazine 12-36 mg per day have been evaluated for the treatment of TD. Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores decline similarly (by 2-5 points) with use of either agent. AIMS response rates, defined by a 50% decline in symptoms, range from 33% to 50%. Both agents are well tolerated, with somnolence and akathisia reported most frequently (at low rates). Agent selection may be guided by manufacturer labeling recommendations for special populations and cost considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Valbenazine and deutetrabenazine were demonstrated to be effective in decreasing AIMS scores and were well tolerated in randomized controlled trials. These treatments may be considered as a next-line option when traditional strategies are not feasible or are ineffective. Head-to-head studies are warranted to decipher if either agent is preferable in terms of efficacy or tolerability.

Medication Options and Clinical Strategies for Treating Tardive Dyskinesia.

Valbenazine and deutetrabenazine are FDA-approved as treatment for tardive dyskinesia (TD). Both medications are vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, and both are effective for reducing TD symptoms. Clinicians need to be aware of the adverse effects of valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, as well as other key differences between the two, in order to individualize treatment. Using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale assists clinicians in assessing progress for each patient. Treating TD effectively with these new medications will reduce the burden of the condition for patients.

A Phase 3, 1-Year, Open-Label Trial of Valbenazine in Adults With Tardive Dyskinesia.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Valbenazine is approved to treat tardive dyskinesia (TD) in adults. KINECT 4 (NCT02405091) was conducted to explore the long-term effects of once-daily valbenazine in patients with TD. METHODS/PROCEDURES: The study included a 48-week, open-label treatment period and 4-week washout. Dosing was initiated at 40 mg/d, with escalation to 80 mg/d at week 4 based on efficacy and tolerability. Standard safety methods were applied, including treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) reporting. Valbenazine effects on TD were assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Clinical Global Impression of Change-TD, and Patient Global Impression of Change. FINDINGS/RESULTS: After week 4, <15% of all participants had a serious TEAE (13.7%) or TEAE leading to discontinuation (11.8%). Participants experienced TD improvements during long-term treatment as indicated by mean change from baseline to week 48 in AIMS total score (sum of items 1-7, evaluated by site raters) with valbenazine 40 mg/d (-10.2 [n = 45]) or 80 mg/d (-11.0 [n = 107]). At week 48, most participants had ≥50% improvement from baseline in AIMS total score (40 mg/d, 90.0%; 80 mg/d, 89.2%), Clinical Global Impression of Change-TD rating of much or very much improved (40 mg/d, 90.0%; 80 mg/d, 95.9%), and Patient Global Impression of Change rating of much or very much improved (40 mg/d, 90.0%; 80 mg/d, 89.2%). No dose effects were apparent by week 36. Week 52 results indicated some loss of effect after washout. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Valbenazine was generally well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were detected. Substantial clinician- and patient-reported improvements were observed in adults with TD who received once-daily valbenazine for up to 48 weeks.

Indirect treatment comparison of valbenazine and deutetrabenazine efficacy and safety in tardive dyskinesia.

Aim: Utilize the Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) method to compare valbenazine and deutetrabenazine efficacy using clinical trial data. Methods: Outcomes included mean change from baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) total score, AIMS response (≥50% improvement), clinical global impression of change response (score ≤2) and safety outcomes. Data were pooled by trial and dose; outcomes were analyzed at multiple time points. Results: ITC of AIMS score improvement significantly favored valbenazine 80 mg/day at 6 weeks versus deutetrabenazine 36 mg/day at 8 weeks, while valbenazine 40 mg/day was statistically similar to all doses of deutetrabenazine at all time points. No significant differences between drugs were found in AIMS and clinical global impression of change responses and safety outcomes. Conclusion: In this ITC of pooled trial data, valbenazine was generally favorable over deutetrabenazine, although dose titration and equivalency should be considered when interpreting results.

Tardive Syndromes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the history, nosology, clinical features, epidemiology, and treatment of tardive syndromes. RECENT FINDINGS: The major advance in the field of tardive syndromes has been the development and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of two vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 inhibitors, valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, for treating tardive syndromes. These medications are derivatives of tetrabenazine and reduce dyskinetic movements by reducing dopamine stimulation. Treatment is not curative, and the medications reduce, or "mask," symptoms but presumably without adding to the long-term risk of increased involuntary movements believed to accrue from suppressive treatment with dopamine receptor-blocking drugs. A confounding advance has been the accumulation of data finding that second-generation antipsychotics, also known as atypical antipsychotics, may not be safer than first-generation antipsychotics in causing tardive syndromes. The public health risk of tardive syndromes may actually have increased as some second-generation antipsychotics, widely promoted to both doctors and patients, are increasingly used as antidepressants. SUMMARY: Tardive syndromes remain a public health risk. Second-generation antipsychotics have not been proven to have less risk than first-generation drugs in causing tardive syndromes and are nevertheless being used more widely to treat depression, bipolar disease, and insomnia. Symptomatic treatment for tardive syndromes is available, although expensive.

Deutetrabenazine in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia.

Tardive dyskinesia is a common movement disorder in the population of patients taking dopamine receptor blocking agents, such as antipsychotics and certain antiemetics, which likely lead to D2-receptor upregulation and hypersensitization. Efficacious and well-tolerated treatments are now available to reduce symptoms. Deutetrabenazine, a reversible inhibitor of vesicular monoamine transporter 2, was US FDA-approved for treatment of tardive dyskinesia in 2017. Two pivotal clinical trials, Aim to Reduce Movements in Tardive Dyskinesia (ARM-TD) and Addressing Involuntary Movements in Tardive Dyskinesia (AIM-TD), provide evidence that deutetrabenazine dosed 24-48 mg/day effectively controlled involuntary movements according to rating scales. Adverse events that occurred more frequently in the deutetrabenazine group (rate >2%) compared with placebo were nasopharyngitis and insomnia. Interim results of a long-term open-label study show continued efficacy and good tolerability, even in combination with baseline dopamine receptor blocking agents.

Deutetrabenazine in the treatment of Huntington's disease.

Deutetrabenazine (DTBZ) is a US FDA-approved treatment for chorea in Huntington's disease. The substitution of deuterium for hydrogen at specific positions imparts a longer half-life on DTBZ, allowing for less-frequent daily dosing. As a reversible vesicular monoamine transporter Type 2 inhibitor, DTBZ depletes monoamines at presynaptic nerve terminals. DTBZ significantly improved chorea in Huntington's disease patients compared with placebo. This effect continued in an ongoing open-label extension study in the cohort who switched from tetrabenazine to DTBZ. Whereas there are currently no head-to-head studies to adequately compare safety profiles between tetrabenazine and DTBZ, an indirect comparison study suggested that the tolerability profile of DTBZ was similar to placebo. In fact, there are currently no direct comparisons between vesicular monoamine transporter Type 2 inhibitors in humans. This review will explore DTBZ's pharmacological properties, drug interactions, administration and efficacy.

VMAT2 Inhibitors for Tardive Dyskinesia-Practice Implications.

Tardive dyskinesia is a potentially irreversible, debilitating, hyperkinetic movement disorder that can result from dopamine receptor antagonists. Prompt recognition and resolution of symptoms are instrumental in preventing disease irreversibility, though current treatment options have fallen short of robust, effective, and long-term symptom control. In April 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 2 new vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, deutetrabenazine and valbenazine, for chorea related to Huntington's disease and tardive dyskinesia, respectively. These agents were pharmacologically modified from tetrabenazine, a VMAT2 inhibitor used off-label in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. Despite FDA-labeled indications of deutetrabenazine and valbenazine, each agent was explored as a treatment option for those with tardive dyskinesia. In this study, the pharmacologic modifications of the 2 new VMAT2 inhibitors are described, with detailed explanation as to how these may impact clinical practice. The associated case series, observational studies, and clinical trials exploring their use in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia are reported with expert opinion on practice implication.

Review of deutetrabenazine: a novel treatment for chorea associated with Huntington's disease.

Deutetrabenazine was recently approved for the treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease (HD) and is the first deuterated medication that has been US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for therapeutic use. In this article, we review deutetrabenazine's drug design, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, efficacy, adverse events, comparison with tetrabenazine, dosage, and administration. Deutetrabenazine is a deuterated form of tetrabenazine and is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor. The substitution of deuterium for hydrogen at key positions in the tetrabenazine molecule allows a longer drug half-life and less frequent daily dosing. Deutetrabenazine is administered twice daily up to a maximum daily dose of 48 mg, which corresponds to a similar daily dose of 100 mg of tetrabenazine. In a Phase III clinical trial (First-HD), there was a statistically significant improvement of chorea in HD subjects, as well as improvements in global impression of change as assessed by both patients and clinicians. This improvement was seen without significant adverse effects as the overall tolerability profile of deutetrabenazine was similar to placebo. Somnolence was the most commonly reported symptom in the deutetrabenazine group. In a study where subjects converted from tetrabenazine to deutetrabenazine in an open-label fashion (ARC-HD) and indirect comparison studies between tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine, there is a suggestion that while efficacy for chorea is similar, the data may slightly favor tetrabenazine, but adverse effects and tolerability strongly favor deutetrabenazine. These data have not been replicated in true head-to-head studies. Current evidence supports that deutetrabenazine is an effective therapeutic treatment option for chorea in HD and may provide a more favorable adverse effect profile than tetrabenazine. However, more data are needed, particularly in the form of head-to-head studies between deutetrabenazine and other treatment options as well as longer term clinical experience with deutetrabenazine.